| Table 2: Multilevel Regression of Support for Income Redistribution | ||||||||||||||||
| M0 | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | ||||||||||||
| Individual-level Variables | ||||||||||||||||
| Economic threat of migration | 0.040 | *** | 0.040 | *** | 0.040 | *** | 0.037 | * | ||||||||
| Cultural threat of migration | -0.027 | ** | -0.027 | ** | -0.026 | ** | -0.026 | ** | ||||||||
| Welfare abuse of migrants | -0.005 | -0.005 | -0.005 | -0.008 | ||||||||||||
| Left-Right-Scale | -0.235 | *** | -0.235 | *** | -0.235 | *** | -0.235 | *** | ||||||||
| Gender (man=1) | -0.097 | *** | -0.097 | *** | -0.097 | *** | -0.095 | *** | ||||||||
| Age | 0.041 | *** | 0.041 | *** | 0.040 | *** | 0.041 | *** | ||||||||
| Age2 | -0.021 | ** | -0.021 | ** | -0.021 | ** | -0.021 | ** | ||||||||
| Household income | -0.130 | *** | -0.130 | *** | -0.130 | *** | -0.128 | *** | ||||||||
| Education | ||||||||||||||||
| ISCED 0-1 | 0.129 | ** | 0.129 | ** | 0.128 | ** | 0.129 | ** | ||||||||
| ISCED 2 | 0.136 | ** | 0.137 | ** | 0.136 | ** | 0.133 | ** | ||||||||
| ISCED 3 | 0.117 | ** | 0.118 | ** | 0.117 | ** | 0.110 | ** | ||||||||
| ISCED 4 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||||||||
| ISCED 5-6 | -0.061 | -0.061 | -0.062 | -0.068 | ||||||||||||
| Bad health status | 0.059 | *** | 0.058 | *** | 0.058 | *** | 0.059 | *** | ||||||||
| Married/Civilian partnership | 0.041 | ** | 0.040 | ** | 0.040 | ** | 0.038 | ** | ||||||||
| Employment Status | ||||||||||||||||
| In paid work | -0.012 | -0.012 | -0.012 | -0.011 | ||||||||||||
| In education | -0.111 | ** | -0.111 | ** | -0.112 | ** | -0.108 | ** | ||||||||
| Unemployed | 0.087 | * | 0.087 | * | 0.087 | * | 0.082 | * | ||||||||
| Not in labor force | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | ||||||||||||
| Country-level Variables | ||||||||||||||||
| Salience pro-welfare issues | 0.177 | ** | 0.173 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Salience anti-migrant issues | 0.022 | 0.025 | ||||||||||||||
| * Economic threat of migration | 0.010 | |||||||||||||||
| * Cultural threat of migration | -0.010 | |||||||||||||||
| * Welfare abuse of migrants | -0.028 | ** | ||||||||||||||
| Welfare Regime | ||||||||||||||||
| Liberal | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||||||||||||
| Socio-democratic | -0.082 | -0.326 | * | -0.330 | ||||||||||||
| Conservative | 0.255 | 0.138 | 0.140 | |||||||||||||
| Constant | 0.020 | -0.008 | -0.107 | 0.049 | 0.051 | |||||||||||
| Variance Components | ||||||||||||||||
| Var(Constant) | 0.0917 | *** | 0.0756 | *** | 0.0502 | *** | 0.0289 | *** | 0.0283 | *** | ||||||
| Var(Economic threat of migration) | 0.0025 | *** | ||||||||||||||
| Var(Cultural threat of migration) | ||||||||||||||||
| Var(Welfare abuse of migrants) | ||||||||||||||||
| Var(Residuals) | 0.9197 | *** | 0.8202 | *** | 0.8202 | *** | 0.8202 | *** | 0.8171 | *** | ||||||
| Statistics | ||||||||||||||||
| N | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | |||||||||||
| n | 17,792 | 17,792 | 17,792 | 17,792 | 17,792 | |||||||||||
| R2 Level 2 (Snijders/Bosker) | 0% | 17.53% | 44.90% | 67.93% | 67.35% | |||||||||||
| R2 Level 1 (Snijders/Bosker) | 0% | 11.44% | 13.94% | 16.05% | 16.09% | |||||||||||
| Log Likelihood | -24,534.78 | -23,515.12 | -23,512.30 | -23,508.52 | -23,485.24 | |||||||||||
| Wald chi2(df) | - | 2,160.84 | 2,169.27 | 2,187.43 | 2,162.46 | |||||||||||
| AIC | 49,075.57 | 47,070.24 | 47,068.59 | 47,065.05 | 47,026.49 | |||||||||||
| Notes: * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 (one-sided tests). All continuous variables are z-standardized. | ||||||||||||||||
| Home | ||||||||||||||||