Table OA2: Multilevel Regression of Support for Income
Redistribution - Model Comparisons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Models
M5 to M7 are identical to the models presented in Table 3 in the paper |
|
|
|
M5 |
M6 |
M7 |
MOA1 |
|
|
Individual-level Variables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic threat of migration |
0.037 |
** |
0.016 |
|
0.038 |
** |
-0.004 |
|
|
|
Cultural threat of migration |
-0.026 |
* |
-0.004 |
|
-0.026 |
* |
-0.010 |
|
|
|
Welfare abuse of migrants |
-0.007 |
|
0.003 |
|
-0.008 |
|
-0.007 |
|
|
|
Left-Right-Scale |
-0.235 |
*** |
-0.235 |
*** |
-0.235 |
*** |
-0.235 |
*** |
|
|
Gender (man=1) |
-0.095 |
*** |
-0.094 |
*** |
-0.095 |
*** |
-0.094 |
*** |
|
|
Age |
0.041 |
*** |
0.040 |
*** |
0.041 |
*** |
0.040 |
*** |
|
|
Age2 |
-0.021 |
** |
-0.021 |
** |
-0.021 |
** |
-0.021 |
** |
|
|
Household income |
-0.128 |
*** |
-0.128 |
*** |
-0.128 |
*** |
-0.128 |
*** |
|
|
Education |
|
|
|
ISCED 0-1 |
0.128 |
** |
0.127 |
** |
0.129 |
** |
0.130 |
** |
|
|
ISCED 2 |
0.133 |
** |
0.133 |
** |
0.133 |
** |
0.133 |
** |
|
|
ISCED 3 |
0.111 |
** |
0.111 |
** |
0.110 |
** |
0.110 |
** |
|
|
ISCED 4 |
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
|
|
ISCED 5-6 |
-0.068 |
|
-0.069 |
|
-0.068 |
|
-0.069 |
|
|
|
Bad health status |
0.058 |
*** |
0.059 |
*** |
0.059 |
*** |
0.059 |
*** |
|
|
Married/Civilian partnership |
0.037 |
** |
0.037 |
** |
0.037 |
** |
0.038 |
** |
|
|
Employment Status |
|
|
|
In paid work |
-0.012 |
|
-0.012 |
|
-0.012 |
|
-0.012 |
|
|
|
In education |
-0.110 |
** |
-0.111 |
** |
-0.109 |
** |
-0.110 |
** |
|
|
Unemployed |
0.080 |
* |
0.080 |
* |
0.081 |
* |
0.080 |
* |
|
|
Not in labor force |
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
|
|
Country-level Variables |
|
|
|
Salience pro-welfare issues |
0.170 |
** |
0.171 |
** |
0.170 |
** |
0.171 |
** |
|
|
Salience anti-migrant issues |
0.023 |
|
0.023 |
|
0.023 |
|
0.025 |
|
|
|
* Economic threat of migration |
|
0.009 |
|
-0.031 |
|
|
|
* Social-democratic |
|
0.047 |
|
|
|
* Conservative |
|
0.079 |
* |
|
|
* Cultural threat of migration |
|
-0.008 |
|
-0.012 |
|
|
|
* Social-democratic |
|
0.010 |
|
|
|
* Conservative |
|
0.025 |
|
|
|
* Welfare abuse of migrants |
|
-0.028 |
*** |
-0.016 |
|
|
|
* Social-democratic |
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
* Conservative |
|
-0.026 |
|
|
|
Welfare Regime |
|
|
|
Liberal |
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
|
|
Social-democratic |
-0.325 |
* |
-0.325 |
* |
-0.324 |
* |
-0.327 |
* |
|
|
* Economic threat of migration |
|
0.031 |
|
0.040 |
|
|
|
* Cultural threat of migration |
|
-0.044 |
|
-0.037 |
|
|
|
* Welfare abuse of migrants |
|
-0.040 |
|
-0.019 |
|
|
Conservative |
0.141 |
|
0.144 |
|
0.140 |
|
0.144 |
|
|
*Economic threat of migration |
|
0.021 |
|
0.050 |
|
|
* Cultural threat of migration |
|
-0.013 |
|
-0.004 |
|
|
* Welfare abuse of migrants |
|
0.009 |
|
0.008 |
|
|
Constant |
0.048 |
|
0.048 |
|
0.047 |
|
0.049 |
|
|
Variance Components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Var(Constant) |
0.0287 |
*** |
0.0233 |
*** |
0.0232 |
*** |
0.0283 |
*** |
|
Var(Economic threat of
migration) |
0.0016 |
*** |
0.0017 |
*** |
0.0019 |
*** |
0.0012 |
*** |
|
Var(Cultural threat of
migration) |
0.0008 |
*** |
0.0004 |
*** |
0.0007 |
*** |
0.0003 |
*** |
|
Var(Welfare abuse of migrants) |
0.0009 |
*** |
0.0004 |
*** |
0.0001 |
* |
0.0000 |
|
|
Var(Residuals) |
0.8167 |
*** |
0.8167 |
*** |
0.8167 |
*** |
0.8165 |
*** |
|
Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
14 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
|
n |
17,792 |
17,792 |
17,792 |
17,792 |
|
Log Likelihood |
-23489.057 |
-23,485.18 |
-23,484.37 |
-23,478.17 |
|
Wald chi2(df) |
2,130.53 |
2,144.87 |
2,154.97 |
2,180.74 |
|
AIC |
47,032.12 |
47,036.35 |
47,028.73 |
47,040.35 |
|
Notes:
* p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 (one-sided tests). All continuous
variables are z-standardized. |
|
The
Models M5 to M7 are the models presented in Table 3 in the paper. |
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|