Table OA4: Multilevel Regression of Support
for Income Redistribution - Model Comparisons (fourfold welfare regime
typology) |
|
|
|
|
|
MOA7 |
MOA8 |
MOA9 |
|
|
Individual-level Variables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic threat of migration |
0.037 |
** |
0.016 |
|
0.037 |
** |
|
|
Cultural threat of migration |
-0.026 |
* |
-0.004 |
|
-0.026 |
* |
|
|
Welfare abuse of migrants |
-0.007 |
|
0.003 |
|
-0.008 |
|
|
|
Left-Right-Scale |
-0.235 |
*** |
-0.235 |
*** |
-0.235 |
*** |
|
|
Gender (man=1) |
-0.095 |
*** |
-0.094 |
*** |
-0.095 |
*** |
|
|
Age |
0.041 |
*** |
0.041 |
*** |
0.041 |
*** |
|
|
Age2 |
-0.021 |
** |
-0.021 |
** |
-0.021 |
** |
|
|
Household income |
-0.128 |
*** |
-0.128 |
*** |
-0.128 |
*** |
|
|
Education |
|
|
|
ISCED 0-1 |
0.125 |
** |
0.125 |
** |
0.126 |
** |
|
|
ISCED 2 |
0.132 |
** |
0.132 |
** |
0.131 |
** |
|
|
ISCED 3 |
0.11 |
** |
0.111 |
** |
0.11 |
** |
|
|
ISCED 4 |
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
|
|
ISCED 5-6 |
-0.068 |
|
-0.068 |
|
-0.069 |
|
|
|
Bad health status |
0.058 |
*** |
0.058 |
*** |
0.059 |
*** |
|
|
Married/Civilian partnership |
0.036 |
* |
0.037 |
** |
0.037 |
** |
|
|
Employment Status |
|
|
|
In paid work |
-0.012 |
|
-0.012 |
|
-0.012 |
|
|
|
In education |
-0.11 |
** |
-0.111 |
** |
-0.108 |
** |
|
|
Unemployed |
0.08 |
* |
0.081 |
* |
0.08 |
* |
|
|
Not in labor force |
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
|
|
Country-level Variables |
|
|
|
Salience pro-welfare issues |
0.191 |
*** |
0.191 |
*** |
0.191 |
*** |
|
|
Salience anti-migrant issues |
0.046 |
|
0.046 |
|
0.046 |
|
|
|
* Economic threat of migration |
|
|
|
|
0.009 |
|
|
* Cultural threat of migration |
|
|
|
|
-0.008 |
|
|
* Welfare abuse of migrants |
|
|
|
|
-0.028 |
*** |
|
Welfare Regime |
|
|
|
Liberal |
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
Ref. |
|
|
|
Social-democratic |
-0.381 |
** |
-0.381 |
** |
-0.379 |
** |
|
|
* Economic threat of migration |
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
* Cultural threat of migration |
|
-0.044 |
|
|
|
* Welfare abuse of migrants |
|
-0.04 |
|
|
|
Conservative |
-0.002 |
|
0.002 |
|
-0.001 |
|
|
|
*Economic threat of migration |
|
0.046 |
|
|
|
* Cultural threat of migration |
|
-0.017 |
|
|
|
* Welfare abuse of migrants |
|
-0.007 |
|
|
|
Mediterranean |
0.28 |
* |
0.288 |
* |
0.277 |
* |
|
|
*Economic threat of migration |
|
-0.025 |
|
|
* Cultural threat of migration |
|
-0.005 |
|
|
* Welfare abuse of migrants |
|
0.041 |
|
|
Constant |
0.082 |
|
0.08 |
|
0.081 |
|
|
Variance Components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Var(Constant) |
0.0196 |
*** |
0.0197 |
*** |
0.0194 |
*** |
|
Var(Economic threat of
migration) |
0.0016 |
*** |
0.0014 |
*** |
0.0018 |
*** |
|
Var(Cultural threat of
migration) |
0.0008 |
*** |
0.0005 |
*** |
0.0007 |
*** |
|
Var(Welfare abuse of migrants) |
0.0010 |
*** |
0.0003 |
*** |
0.0001 |
** |
|
Var(Residuals) |
0.8167 |
*** |
0.8166 |
*** |
0.8167 |
*** |
|
Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
14 |
14 |
14 |
|
n |
17,792 |
17,792 |
17,792 |
|
Log Likelihood |
-23,486.455 |
-23,480.03 |
-23,481.79 |
|
Wald chi2(df) |
2,150.06 |
2,173.56 |
2,174.05 |
|
AIC |
47,028.91 |
47,034.06 |
47,025.58 |
|
Notes:
* p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 (one-sided tests). All continuous
variables are z-standardized. |
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|